Comparison between agar-block and soil-block methods for wood-destroying Basidiomycetes

IRG/WP 92-2401

M B B Monteiro, S Brazolin, G Catanozi

The object of this work is to compare these methods in order to provide some information to help in the choice between them. The comparison was made by a statistical analysis (factorial completely randomized design) and by a discussion about other aspects of each method. An evaluation of some fungi on attacking wood and a comparison between Picnoporus sanguineus isolated from carpophore and decayed wood were made. The results indicated that the loss of mass was greater in soil-block. Besides, the activity of the fungi in this method was more homogeneous than in agar-block. However the soil-block method presents some difficulties not found in the agar-block method. As related to the performance of Picnoporus sanguineus strains, the greater loss of mass occured when it was isolated from carpophore, no matter what method was used. These results give important indications about the biological characteristics and the source of the strains.


Keywords: AGAR/BLOCK METHOD; SOIL/BLOCK METHOD; ACCELERATED DECAY TESTS; LABORATORY TEST METHODS

Conference: 92-05-10/15 Harrogate, England, UK


Download document (350 kb)
free for the members of IRG. Available if purchased.

Purchase this document